You are searching about Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much, today we will share with you article about Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much is useful to you.
Deconstructing Non-Sustainable Agriculture
The Green Revolution refers to the dramatic increase in food calorie production occurring with the following developments: I) selective breeding of high-yielding crops, which also exhibit additional resistance to common diseases; ii) widespread use of fertilizers and pesticides. iii) mechanization of crop harvesting. Beginning in the 1940s, the Green Revolution successfully overcame developing famines in many developing countries and enabled significant population increases worldwide.
Large-scale industrial agriculture has greatly reduced the cost of food production, leading to joint economic benefits for consumers and large corporations. Scientific progress in genetic engineering, together with targeted investment by industry, has further enhanced crop productivity through the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The primary use of GMOs has been to provide food crops with resistance to toxic chemicals, which can then be used to prevent the growth of competitive weeds. These toxic chemicals (pesticides) are freely applied to crop fields until some of the weeds acquire the same protective genes. Food crops then require further genetic modification to resist newer pesticides to which the weeds are sensitive, at least for a time. Another government allowed use of GMOs was to limit the viability of seeds produced from “proprietary” crops. The widespread contamination of all farmland with toxic pesticides puts organic farming at a competitive disadvantage, yet the decision to use modified GM seeds creates a dependency on industry and the risk of continued economic abuse.
Not only can there be widespread pesticide contamination in other farmland, but traces of the toxins can soon appear in livestock, domestic animals and humans. It is particularly disturbing that pesticides can now be easily detected in the umbilical cord blood of newborn babies as well as in municipal drinking water.
Fertilizer use also has a disadvantage in that the only relevant success criterion is overall caloric productivity. In addition to nutrients necessary for growth, many plant species under natural conditions will produce secondary metabolites of no apparent significant benefit to the plant, but of significant benefit to animals and humans. Various vitamins and a variety of trace elements fall into this category. Their levels in plants grown in heavily fertilized soils are significantly lower than in organically grown crops. The consequence of many foods being deficient in various micronutrients has not been realistically addressed by either industry or government.
While contributing to an unsanitary environment, agriculture has also been affected by industrial pollution from mining, processing and waste disposal. Rather than sustaining and promoting plant growth, certain sources of irrigation water are now seen as the cause of stunted growth. Relatively large quantities of toxic water have now been isolated as forever useless for irrigation.
In order to make progress, unintended practices that lead to unsustainable agriculture must be replaced by a more reasoned and rational approach. The following three areas are very important. I) Reduce the use of pesticides and instead rely on the natural interaction of competing living organisms to devise non-toxic methods to promote the growth of food crops. ii) Reduce the use of nutrient-limited fertilizers and ensure soil availability of a full range of micronutrients and trace elements. iii) Increase the kinetic activity of water used to support plant growth and apply the same principle of water activation to help disinfect currently useless water supplies. Each approach will be briefly described:
1. The web of life involves interactive dependencies and competitions between various organisms. Reduced food production can result from the overgrowth of certain microorganisms that can cause direct damage to a food or from competing plants, such as weeds, that may outperform the food. The answer to both issues is to understand the biology and natural predators of the offending species. Efforts can then be devised to reduce the relative efficiency of these natural predators so that the competitive advantage returns to food crops. A basic principle is that the advantage will go to whichever species has the best alternative cellular energy pathway (ACE), as this pathway appears to provide a somewhat universal defense against many pathogens. The MEA pathway is expressed as a dynamic water activity within living cells and baths. Dynamic activity is defined as KELEA (kinetic energy limiting electrostatic attraction). It can be transmitted to crops through the use of KELEA activated water or potentially attracted directly to the plant from the environment. The feasibility of the first approach with rice and sugarcane has been demonstrated and published, while efforts are underway to develop the second approach.
2. Replenishment of overfertilized fields with trace elements and with chemicals required for micronutrients can be achieved using a variety of products such as humic/fulvic acids and a variety of natural vegetation, not currently cultivated with fertilizers, respectively. The possibility of using Kudzu as a source of the latter is worth considering.
3. The usefulness of KELEA activated water for enhancing the productivity of food crops extends far beyond the question of increasing the defense against infectious agents. KELEA adds to overall plant productivity, including in some cases delayed senescence. It can also significantly extend the life of harvested plants. The other potential benefit of activating KELEA water is that it loosens the intermolecular hydrogen bonds that lead to the detachment of many toxic chemicals from the water molecules so that the chemicals can be removed more easily.
KELEA water and plant activation methods are being actively pursued to determine which are most suitable for various applications. Essentially, the methods are inexpensive and relatively easy to implement, even in large-scale settings. The venture is at odds with the interests of manufacturers of fertilizers, pesticides and GMO crops. It is also inappropriate to limit the effort of commercial entities wishing to profit from an urgent humanitarian need. The sheer scope of the field is beyond that of a single charity. However, sharing responsibility for a common project is not of interest to these organizations, as they rely on unique issues to attract exclusively dedicated donors. The source of funding to carry out these studies must be newly printed by the US Federal Reserve, essentially a capital tax on the currency.
Video about Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much
You can see more content about Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much on our youtube channel: Click Here
Question about Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much
If you have any questions about Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!
The article Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!
Rate Articles Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much
Rate: 4-5 stars
Search keywords Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much
Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much
way Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much
tutorial Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much
Animal Testing Alternatives Increase Animal Population By How Much free
#Deconstructing #NonSustainable #Agriculture