You are searching about Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them, today we will share with you article about Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them is useful to you.

From Darwin – Evolutionism to Intelligent Design – Inevitably!

No reasonable mind – given the evidence of buttons and buttonholes on a garment – would deny that both “intelligence” and “design” played a role in the creation of such a garment. However, the mystery of mysteries, the most intelligent and educated in our culture, reject such thoughts of infinitely more advanced living organisms, insisting (dogmatically) that they somehow evolved by random chance – the simple occasional “copying errors” (as divided the double helix , which replicates itself) of one of the 3 billion elements of DNA base pairs – just various mistakes, but somehow perfectly and randomly sequentialproducing complex plants, animals, humans!

The attitude of the intellectual elite – the most intelligent, highly educated leaders of society, the editors of the New Yorker magazine, the columnist Richard Cohen, the Judges, et al., is that:

  • Darwinism is proven scientific fact.
  • Creationism, under the guise of Intelligent Design, is only religious zeal that seeks to bring Religion into order.
  • Such teachings must be curtailed by expulsion of the teacher. (The recent documentary film Expelled and books on a similar subject describe the consequences of teaching a competing theory such as Intelligent Design. Remarkably, a century ago, fear of similar backlash caused even world-class scientists to do the unthinkable:
  1. Dr. Charles Walcott, Director of the Smithsonian Institution, in 1909, discovered 60,000 fossils in the Canadian Rockies from the all-important Permian era – but reburied them in Smithsonian basement cabinets, fearing personal criticism because they presented challenges to his theory Darwin’s – all fossils showed fully formed extant creatures. This important trove of fossils, the largest ever found, was only recently rediscovered.
  2. Dr. Albert Einstein, considered perhaps the greatest “thinker” ever, added a “fudge factor” to his Field Equations so that the expanding universe they described would have a “fixed” size – to avoid the conclusion in the first line of Genesis. He later admitted: “It was the biggest blunder of my life.”

Pro-Darwinian scientists – arguably strong believers in his theory – are convinced that life originated from lightning striking an inorganic reservoir of probiotic ‘soup’, then evolved into all life forms by ‘random mutations’ and ‘survival of the fittest’ . However, as honest scientists, they describe their efforts to validate Darwinian-Evolutionism with honest admissions of the mysteries they encounter in their research: “almost like a miracle.” “How could that come from that?” “but which came first, like the chicken and the egg?” and “if so, there would seem to be very little difference between a Darwinian explanation and an honest admission that a miracle was happening!”. etc. Such frank acknowledgments by pro-Darwinian scientists demonstrate – they cannot prove what their advocates claim.

Note 1. A challenge to Darwinism at the basic plasma level is the argument from compound probabilities – random, sequential random mutations (Darwin’s basic theory is that the “misprints” of individual elements when breaking the DNA double helix happen randomly) . According to Darwin, mistakes that improve the possibility of survival in the competition for life are passed on to the offspring – however, if they are disadvantageous, the creature does not survive and the mutation stops. So how is the bird explained – it escapes from predators because it can fly – and it flies because of feathers, wings, a light body, branch legs, a simple digestive tube and beak to eat worms and seeds. Each of these traits must be the result of random mutations from a type of parent creature – yet how can an honest Darwinist really believe that each trait came from an original random mutation and all that it just happened to happen at the same time.

Note 2. It is not disputed, however, that Darwin’s theory does apply to life, but at the secondary level of sub-species, after the original organism (somehow) came into existence. Thus the diversity of finch beak shapes (adapted to food sources), human and bear skin colors (optimization against life-threatening extremes of sunlight strengths or weaknesses in various ancestral areas of the world: Africa, India, Northern Europe, etc.) – “Moths, pansies, and dogs may change color and size, but they remain moths, pansies, and dogs.”

Opposing Darwinism-Evolution, however, is a pantheon of scientists and mathematicians with a litany of overwhelming scientific disagreements, characterizing the astronomical improbabilities of Darwinism-Evolution in all relevant scientific fields,

Logically, therefore, since neither theory can be proven or disproved, but with the unquestionable mathematical pessimism of Darwinism (by default, not faith), Intelligent Design must win intellectually as the most reasonable theory for the causative agent of life on Earth!

Recognizing, however, that the dominant authorities of Western civilization have strong beliefs in Darwinian evolution, the inevitable culture clash is evidenced by expressed beliefs: “mankind is but an accident of nature.” “Man may never have existed at all”; “so there is no higher moral authority than man!” With such a belief system and no moral or ethical constraints, man’s unfettered curiosity has already been unleashed:

  • Sheep and dog cloning, reportedly.
  • Human cloning?
  • Animal-animal mating – sperm-egg?
  • Human-animal mating – sperm-egg?
  • Many genetic experiments are reported in different countries, with Dr. Frankenstein ran amok in his laboratories, completely oblivious to the potential nightmarish dangers of unintended consequences!

Video about Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them

You can see more content about Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them on our youtube channel: Click Here

Question about Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them

If you have any questions about Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!

The article Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!

Rate Articles Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them

Rate: 4-5 stars
Ratings: 9842
Views: 79748584

Search keywords Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them

Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them
way Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them
tutorial Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them
Animal Ripping Heads Of Chickens But Not Eating Them free
#Darwin #Evolutionism #Intelligent #Design #Inevitably

Source: https://ezinearticles.com/?From-Darwin—Evolutionism-to-Intelligent-Design—Inevitably!&id=1752326

Có thể bạn quan tâm: